CO129-624-8 Immigration control- expulsion of undesirables 1-8-1949 - 31-1-1951 — Page 4

To bongkong laving 322-

bonfidential

- Ref (2) 20 MAR 28

4

27-3-50

5. P.D. Coates (F.0)

we (4)

鄂

6. for

tel. 507 Sar.com/

8-5-50.

Mr Hall.

(Ref. 2.4).

We spoke.

?

Mr Trunch

is

Sure

in off?

I in

that Peking will object

to them action being taken under the ordinance,

but he wo prefer to see

our letter before commenting

further.

7 N.C.C. French (6.0)

J. J.Abram.

16/5

misel

16/5K.

20-5-50.

Mr Sidelo tham

There are the pp the Shattock mentioned to you. Para 7 of (6) suggested that Me Hutchison should be consalted. this reply only came in lost night & is still to be copied but needless to say is against action bing taken under the Repulsion of Undesirable,

Grd 1949.

he

The letter in wrote to the F.O. is at (7) 4 Mr Tunch has promised to let us here the F.O. wins within the next day

or so.

I understand

they think that as deporters" under the existing low on aly accepted by the C.d.fut with reluctance, the C.. Good would refuse to accept large numbers of deporties under the Expelicon Ord & therefore there would